Website Login // Register
Benchmarking is Great, Until it Limits You
Main / CEO Perspectives  

As a newcomer to the copier and printer industry, it was important for me to benchmark Fisher's against the best copier companies in the country. I did this through our association in the Copier Dealer Association, through my position on Canon's Dealer Advisory Council, and through other industry relationships. While invaluable to our turnaround of Fisher's, benchmarking also has a major risk: Becoming limited in ideas, strategies, and expectations.

Fisher’s is entering a new fiscal year and we are going through our annual strategy development process. As I review the strategies and initiatives from last year, I realize these are “office technology company” oriented… they are strategies and initiatives you can read in any industry journal or hear from industry analysts and consultants.

Now that we are one of the best companies in the industry, my challenge to our senior team is to question how great that really is… is being a great copier company truly being a great company? I don’t think so.
 
We need to be looking at low-tech, highly service oriented industries like plumbing… how are they earning their business service call by service call?  We need to be looking at high-tech industries like semiconductors to see how they are innovating with new technologies that are making a highly price competitive industry profitable. We should be looking at airlines, restaurants, ski resorts, golf courses, and real estate brokerages to see how they are differentiating with service in tough economic times.
 
We should not be benchmarking with the best companies in our industry… we should be looking for the best industries for our benchmarks.  I can learn a lot from great copier companies, but if I stop there I will be significantly limiting my ability to build a world-class customer experience.
 

 

Share |
Posted by Christopher Taylor at 8/4/2009 4:23 PM Permalink | Trackback
Comments (1)
Re:Benchmarking is Great, Until it Limits You
Being "one of the best companies in the industry", as you stated in your post, I'm surprised that Fisher's would file a formal complaint after loosing a large bid with the Meridian Shcool District. I wonder what Fisher's feels they will gain by confronting a decision that was made by a very competent group of board members? Now don't misunderstand, I feel that all local city, county & state agencies that use tax payer money to operate should be required to keep the tax payers hard earned dollar in the local economy, with truly locally companies. I think city, county, state agencies, schools and universities don't realize the real damage that they are causing by sending taxpayer dollars out of state and how extremely difficult it is to replace those dollars. However, I think you may have done more damage to your reputation by handling it the way you did. Maybe you should consider using Gary's experience and knowledge as Idaho's director of the Department of Commerce in his past to change the way local and state governmental agencies purchase items with taxpayer money.

I really believe that other governmental agencies and even companies that are aware of this situation will be less inclined to include Fisher's in a bid for fear of retribution. What is the lesson to be learned? Be very careful how you react and respond to rejection, as it can come back to haunt you. I know that I am not one that would choose to get involved with a company that would react in a way that would questions a knowledgable group of individuals decision or strike back in this manner. Sometimes it is better to just simply recognize that there is more to the buying decision than price alone. Fisher's didn't have what they needed and they shouldn't be forced to go back on a decision that has already been made.
Posted by Anonymous on 8/8/2009 10:42 AM
Add Comment
Provide comments on this blog entry. If you have an account with this site please sign in.
*Title *Email Web Address *Comments